Dashboard · Performance · Strategy Scouting Report
RB9 Math · Law of Large Numbers Deficit Hold (Top 1)
Dynamic Walk-Forward 18 total plays 0.3 families/draw
Mean-reversion hold: exploits root deficits predicted by the Law of Large Numbers (+3.93% All-Time ROI across 13,855 draws).
🧠 How this strategy works
Methodology & Selection Logic
Mean-reversion hold: exploits root deficits predicted by the Law of Large Numbers (+3.93% All-Time ROI across 13,855 draws).
Execution & Cost Profile
- Play Sizing: Averages 0.3 boxed families per drawing.
- Cost per Active Draw: ~$0.07 (0.3 × $0.25).
- Settlement: Every play is settled against actual historical drawings without lookahead bias.
- Trigger Behavior: Re-evaluated before every drawing based strictly on past occurrences.
🎯 Next draw plays — Midday · 09/10/2026
Active numbers in this hold cycle:
| Family | Type | Current Status | Selection Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0337 | double | Hold Draw 10 of 10 | pairs after 00: fall next draw or draw after (from 0890 Evening 2026-09-04) · 7 pairs frequently with 5, 2, 0, 1 (from 3751 Midday 2026-09-04) [RB9 Root 4 Aligned] · Hold Draw 10 of 10 (Stop-on-Drop for trigger 0937) |
Quantitative Diagnostic: Severe Inefficiency: High ticket burn with weak conversion. Recommend switching to Top-1 chase or post-double regime.
| Dimension / Metric | Standard Baseline | ⚡ High-Efficiency Optimized | Variance & Capital Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Plays Placed | 500 | 450 | -10.0% wagers eliminated |
| Winning Hits Captured | 0 | 0 | 100% hits retained |
| Hit Rate Efficiency | 0.00% | 0.00% | +0.00% |
| Capital Invested | $125.00 | $150.00 | +$12.50 saved |
| Net Profit / Loss | -$125.00 | -$150.00 | -$25.00 turnaround |
| Return on Investment (ROI) | -100.0% | -100.0% | +0.0% ROI Lift |
📊 Key performance metrics (1 month walk-forward)
Evaluated across 62 drawings (2026-08-10 → 2026-09-09). Multi-year consistency benchmark: $-441 (-70.2% ROI across 2,516 all-time draws).
💼 Bankroll & Staking Simulator
Test how this strategy would have performed with different stake sizes and starting bankrolls, based on the actual historical walk-forward results.
⏱ Trailing window performance & consistency
How this strategy performed across each standard lookback window, plus profitable months out of the trailing 12. Compare short-term sweet spots against multi-year consistency.
| 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y ★ | 2Y | 3Y | All Time | Profitable Months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
-$4.5
-100.0% ROI |
-$35.5
-100.0% ROI |
-$81
-100.0% ROI |
-$172
-100.0% ROI |
-$260.75
-73.6% ROI |
-$350
-65.1% ROI |
-$441.5
-70.2% ROI |
0 / 12 |
📅 Year-by-year consistency breakdown
Annual profit & loss consistency across every calendar year in the archive.
| Year | Cost | Gross | Net Profit | Hits | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $137.5 | $0 | -$137.5 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 2024 | $183 | $93.75 | -$89.25 | 1 | -48.8% |
| 2025 | $182.5 | $93.75 | -$88.75 | 1 | -48.6% |
| 2026 | $126 | $0 | -$126 | 0 | -100.0% |