Dashboard · Performance · Strategy Scouting Report
Pickstics Follower · Post-Double Phase Hold (Top 1)
Dynamic Walk-Forward 140 total plays 0.2 families/draw
Targeted hold: wagers on the #1 follower line only after double or triple draws (+59.6% 1Y ROI).
🧠 How this strategy works
Methodology & Selection Logic
Targeted hold: wagers on the #1 follower line only after double or triple draws (+59.6% 1Y ROI).
Execution & Cost Profile
- Play Sizing: Averages 0.2 boxed families per drawing.
- Cost per Active Draw: ~$0.05 (0.2 × $0.25).
- Settlement: Every play is settled against actual historical drawings without lookahead bias.
- Trigger Behavior: Re-evaluated before every drawing based strictly on past occurrences.
🎯 Next draw plays — Night · 09/07/2026
Hold Radar Active — Awaiting Trigger Drawing
No qualifying trigger condition was detected in the most recent drawing, or this strategy is resting outside its designated draw slot (all draws). As soon as the next qualifying number is drawn, the engine automatically initializes the 10-draw hold countdown.
Quantitative Diagnostic: Severe Inefficiency: High ticket burn with weak conversion. Recommend switching to Top-1 chase or post-double regime.
| Dimension / Metric | Standard Baseline | ⚡ High-Efficiency Optimized | Variance & Capital Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Plays Placed | 120 | 101 | -15.8% wagers eliminated |
| Winning Hits Captured | 0 | 0 | 100% hits retained |
| Hit Rate Efficiency | 0.00% | 0.00% | +0.00% |
| Capital Invested | $30.00 | $34.00 | +$4.75 saved |
| Net Profit / Loss | -$30.00 | -$34.00 | -$4.00 turnaround |
| Return on Investment (ROI) | -100.0% | -100.0% | +0.0% ROI Lift |
📊 Key performance metrics (1 year walk-forward)
Evaluated across 730 drawings (2025-09-06 → 2026-09-06). Multi-year consistency benchmark: $-37 (-100.0% ROI across 150 all-time draws).
💼 Bankroll & Staking Simulator
Test how this strategy would have performed with different stake sizes and starting bankrolls, based on the actual historical walk-forward results.
⏱ Trailing window performance & consistency
How this strategy performed across each standard lookback window, plus profitable months out of the trailing 12. Compare short-term sweet spots against multi-year consistency.
| 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y ★ | 2Y | 3Y | All Time | Profitable Months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — |
-$10
-100.0% ROI |
-$22.5
-100.0% ROI |
-$35
-100.0% ROI |
-$37.5
-100.0% ROI |
-$37.5
-100.0% ROI |
-$37.5
-100.0% ROI |
0 / 10 |
📅 Year-by-year consistency breakdown
Annual profit & loss consistency across every calendar year in the archive.
| Year | Cost | Gross | Net Profit | Hits | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $0 | $0 | +$0 | 0 | — |
| 2024 | $0 | $0 | +$0 | 0 | — |
| 2025 | $7.5 | $0 | -$7.5 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 2026 | $30 | $0 | -$30 | 0 | -100.0% |