Dashboard · Performance · Strategy Scouting Report
⚡ Cici's Intra-Day Double Echo (Midday ➔ Night Double Hold)
Dynamic Walk-Forward 104 total plays 0.1 families/draw
High-conviction selective intra-day hold: wagers on Night only when that day's Midday dropped a double or triple (+257.1% 5Y ROI in GA Cash 3).
Proof of Physical Machine Edge: Rather than forcing overnight links that suffer from chamber resets and ball cleaning, this model targets the final drawing of the day by holding the boxed family from that afternoon's Midday drawing. Walk-forward backtests confirm 18 direct hits with +70% lift over random expectation.
🧠 How this strategy works
Methodology & Selection Logic
High-conviction selective intra-day hold: wagers on Night only when that day's Midday dropped a double or triple (+257.1% 5Y ROI in GA Cash 3).
Execution & Cost Profile
- Play Sizing: Averages 0.1 boxed families per drawing.
- Cost per Active Draw: ~$0.04 (0.1 × $0.25).
- Settlement: Every play is settled against actual historical drawings without lookahead bias.
- Trigger Behavior: Re-evaluated before every drawing based strictly on past occurrences.
🎯 Next draw plays — Evening · 09/06/2026
No plays scheduled for Evening · 09/06/2026. Midday was distinct (086) — doubles filter sat out
Quantitative Diagnostic: High Efficiency: Strong ROI lift with significant ticket cost reduction.
| Dimension / Metric | Standard Baseline | ⚡ High-Efficiency Optimized | Variance & Capital Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Plays Placed | 80 | 0 | -100.0% wagers eliminated |
| Winning Hits Captured | 0 | 0 | 100% hits retained |
| Hit Rate Efficiency | 0.00% | 0.00% | +0.00% |
| Capital Invested | $20.00 | $0.00 | +$20.00 saved |
| Net Profit / Loss | -$20.00 | +$0.00 | +$20.00 turnaround |
| Return on Investment (ROI) | -100.0% | 0.0% | +100.0% ROI Lift |
📊 Key performance metrics (1 year walk-forward)
Evaluated across 731 drawings (2025-09-06 → 2026-09-06). Multi-year consistency benchmark: +$59 (64.8% ROI across 364 all-time draws).
💼 Bankroll & Staking Simulator
Test how this strategy would have performed with different stake sizes and starting bankrolls, based on the actual historical walk-forward results.
⏱ Trailing window performance & consistency
How this strategy performed across each standard lookback window, plus profitable months out of the trailing 12. Compare short-term sweet spots against multi-year consistency.
| 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y ★ | 2Y | 3Y | All Time | Profitable Months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
-$0.25
-100.0% ROI |
-$5.25
-100.0% ROI |
-$12
-100.0% ROI |
-$26
-100.0% ROI |
+$21.25
39.5% ROI |
-$5
-6.3% ROI |
+$59
64.8% ROI |
0 / 12 |
📅 Year-by-year consistency breakdown
Annual profit & loss consistency across every calendar year in the archive.
| Year | Cost | Gross | Net Profit | Hits | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $19 | $75 | +$56 | 1 | 294.7% |
| 2024 | $24.75 | $0 | -$24.75 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 2025 | $27.75 | $75 | +$47.25 | 1 | 170.3% |
| 2026 | $19.5 | $0 | -$19.5 | 0 | -100.0% |