Dashboard · Performance · Strategy Scouting Report
RB9 Math · Date-Harmony Hold (Top 1)
Dynamic Walk-Forward 681 total plays 0.9 families/draw
Root Base 9 invariant hold: wagers on the top candidate harmonized with the Date Root + Mirror/Flip (+84.93% 1Y ROI, +1.77% All-Time ROI).
Proof of Mathematical Edge: In number theory, every integer collapses modulo 9 into an invariant residue root. By synchronizing candidate selections with the Date Root plus Mirror and Flip triads, this engine captured 39 hits in the trailing year to deliver the highest flat net profit across all tested models.
🧠 How this strategy works
Methodology & Selection Logic
Root Base 9 invariant hold: wagers on the top candidate harmonized with the Date Root + Mirror/Flip (+84.93% 1Y ROI, +1.77% All-Time ROI).
Execution & Cost Profile
- Play Sizing: Averages 0.9 boxed families per drawing.
- Cost per Active Draw: ~$0.23 (0.9 × $0.25).
- Settlement: Every play is settled against actual historical drawings without lookahead bias.
- Trigger Behavior: Re-evaluated before every drawing based strictly on past occurrences.
🎯 Next draw plays — Evening · 09/06/2026
Active numbers in this hold cycle:
| Family | Type | Current Status | Selection Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | distinct | Hold Draw 2 of 10 | 7 pairs frequently with 5, 2, 0, 1 (from 557 Midday 2026-09-05) · 7 pairs frequently with 5, 2, 0, 1 (from 187 Midday 2026-09-04) [RB9 Root 1 Aligned] · Hold Draw 2 of 10 (Stop-on-Drop for trigger 280) |
Quantitative Diagnostic: Severe Inefficiency: High ticket burn with weak conversion. Recommend switching to Top-1 chase or post-double regime.
| Dimension / Metric | Standard Baseline | ⚡ High-Efficiency Optimized | Variance & Capital Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Plays Placed | 500 | 424 | -15.2% wagers eliminated |
| Winning Hits Captured | 1 | 0 | 0.0% hits retained |
| Hit Rate Efficiency | 0.20% | 0.00% | -0.20% |
| Capital Invested | $125.00 | $141.25 | +$19.00 saved |
| Net Profit / Loss | -$50.00 | -$141.25 | -$91.25 turnaround |
| Return on Investment (ROI) | -40.0% | -100.0% | -60.0% ROI Lift |
📊 Key performance metrics (1 year walk-forward)
Evaluated across 731 drawings (2025-09-06 → 2026-09-06). Multi-year consistency benchmark: $-402 (-64.1% ROI across 2,509 all-time draws).
💼 Bankroll & Staking Simulator
Test how this strategy would have performed with different stake sizes and starting bankrolls, based on the actual historical walk-forward results.
⏱ Trailing window performance & consistency
How this strategy performed across each standard lookback window, plus profitable months out of the trailing 12. Compare short-term sweet spots against multi-year consistency.
| 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y ★ | 2Y | 3Y | All Time | Profitable Months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
-$2.75
-100.0% ROI |
-$33.75
-100.0% ROI |
-$79.25
-100.0% ROI |
-$170.25
-100.0% ROI |
-$277.75
-78.7% ROI |
-$460.75
-86.0% ROI |
-$402.25
-64.1% ROI |
0 / 12 |
📅 Year-by-year consistency breakdown
Annual profit & loss consistency across every calendar year in the archive.
| Year | Cost | Gross | Net Profit | Hits | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $137.5 | $150 | +$12.5 | 3 | 9.1% |
| 2024 | $183 | $0 | -$183 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 2025 | $182.5 | $75 | -$107.5 | 1 | -58.9% |
| 2026 | $124.25 | $0 | -$124.25 | 0 | -100.0% |