Dashboard · Performance · Strategy Scouting Report

Cash 4 High-Conviction Consensus (≥ 2 Agreement)

Dynamic Walk-Forward 5 total plays 0.2 families/draw

Selective consensus sniper: wagers ONLY on families recommended by at least 2 independent 4-digit quantitative engines, weighted by empirical engine hit accuracy.

🧠 How this strategy works

Methodology & Selection Logic

Selective consensus sniper: wagers ONLY on families recommended by at least 2 independent 4-digit quantitative engines, weighted by empirical engine hit accuracy.

Execution & Cost Profile

  • Play Sizing: Averages 0.2 boxed families per drawing.
  • Cost per Active Draw: ~$0.04 (0.2 × $0.25).
  • Settlement: Every play is settled against actual historical drawings without lookahead bias.
  • Trigger Behavior: Re-evaluated before every drawing based strictly on past occurrences.

🎯 Next draw plays — Evening · 09/12/2026

No plays scheduled for Evening · 09/12/2026. No multi-engine consensus found for this drawing — disciplined sit-out.

⚡ STRATEGY EFFICIENCY & CAPITAL OPTIMIZATION TERMINAL Efficiency Grade: B Archetype: REGIME SPECIALIST
Ticket Waste Index: 0%

Quantitative Diagnostic: Moderate Efficiency: Breakeven equilibrium; capital preserved with reduced downside exposure.

Dimension / Metric Standard Baseline ⚡ High-Efficiency Optimized Variance & Capital Lift
Total Plays Placed 0 0 -0% wagers eliminated
Winning Hits Captured 0 0 100% hits retained
Hit Rate Efficiency 0.00% 0.00% +0.00%
Capital Invested $0.00 $0.00 +$0.00 saved
Net Profit / Loss +$0.00 +$0.00 +$0.00 turnaround
Return on Investment (ROI) 0.0% 0.0% +0.0% ROI Lift
🛡️ Tailored Optimization Rules Applied to this Model
Top-K Concentration: Capped at top lines to eliminate dilution
Anti-Repeat Shield: 15-draw trailing blackout (< 0.08% repeat rate)
Wave Sizing & Trough Protection: $0.50 Wave 1 / $0.00 Dead Zone (Draws 4–6)
Draw 10 Zero Exposure Mandate: 🛑 $0.00 Sit Out on Step 10 (Terminal Hard-Stop)

📊 Key performance metrics (1 month walk-forward)

Multi-Year Consistency Window

Evaluated across 31 drawings (2026-08-11 → 2026-09-08). Multi-year consistency benchmark: +$169 (927.4% ROI across 71 all-time draws).

Net Profit -$1.25
Return on Investment -100.0%
Hit Rate 0.00%
Max Drawdown -$-1.25
Active Drawings 31
Total Plays Placed 5
Total Winning Hits 0
Gross Revenue $0

💼 Bankroll & Staking Simulator

Test how this strategy would have performed with different stake sizes and starting bankrolls, based on the actual historical walk-forward results.

Total Staked (Cost) $1.25
Total Payout (Gross) $0
Net Profit / Loss -$1.25
Final Bankroll $498.75
Max historical drawdown scaled to selected stake: -$-1.25. Recommended minimum bankroll to withstand historical drawdowns: $-1.
🛡️ 1% Bankroll Rule Check: Professional risk sizing says no single draw should ever risk >1% of your bankroll.

⏱ Trailing window performance & consistency

How this strategy performed across each standard lookback window, plus profitable months out of the trailing 12. Compare short-term sweet spots against multi-year consistency.

1M 3M 6M 1Y ★ 2Y 3Y All Time Profitable Months
-$1.25
-100.0% ROI
-$3.5
-100.0% ROI
+$182.25
3471.4% ROI
+$178.5
1983.3% ROI
+$174
1288.9% ROI
+$169.25
927.4% ROI
+$169.25
927.4% ROI
1 / 10

📅 Year-by-year consistency breakdown

Annual profit & loss consistency across every calendar year in the archive.

YearCostGrossNet ProfitHitsROI
2023 $0 $0 +$0 0
2024 $4.75 $0 -$4.75 0 -100.0%
2025 $5.5 $0 -$5.5 0 -100.0%
2026 $8 $187.5 +$179.5 1 2243.8%

📈 Monthly profit & loss history

26-09 $-1