Dashboard · Performance · Strategy Scouting Report
Consensus Panel
Dynamic Walk-Forward 1,088 total plays 5.9 families/draw
Plays families recommended by at least 2 of: empirical-followed-by, hot-10, hot-double-18, overdue-10, carryover-overdue-10. Pads with the hottest list if fewer than 5 qualify.
🧠 How this strategy works
Methodology & Selection Logic
Aggregates votes from multiple specialized signal models for the upcoming drawing. When multiple independent systems (empirical follow-through, overdue cycles, seasonality, profit leaders) converge on the same family, it earns a consensus vote. Families with 2 or more votes are prioritized.
Execution & Cost Profile
- Play Sizing: Averages 5.9 boxed families per drawing.
- Cost per Active Draw: ~$1.48 (5.9 × $0.25).
- Settlement: Every play is settled against actual historical drawings without lookahead bias.
- Trigger Behavior: Re-evaluated before every drawing based strictly on past occurrences.
🎯 Next draw plays — Midday · 09/05/2026
Playing 6 families for $1.50 total stake.
| Family | Type | Selection Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 034 | distinct | voted by 2: overdue-10, carryover-overdue-10 |
| 037 | distinct | voted by 2: overdue-10, carryover-overdue-10 |
| 039 | distinct | voted by 2: overdue-10, carryover-overdue-10 |
| 116 | double | voted by 2: overdue-10, carryover-overdue-10 |
| 156 | distinct | voted by 2: hot-10, carryover-overdue-10 |
| 168 | distinct | voted by 2: overdue-10, carryover-overdue-10 |
📊 Key performance metrics (3 months walk-forward)
Evaluated across 184 drawings (2026-06-05 → 2026-09-04). Multi-year consistency benchmark: $-88 (-2.2% ROI across 2,506 all-time draws).
💼 Bankroll & Staking Simulator
Test how this strategy would have performed with different stake sizes and starting bankrolls, based on the actual historical walk-forward results.
⏱ Trailing window performance & consistency
How this strategy performed across each standard lookback window, plus profitable months out of the trailing 12. Compare short-term sweet spots against multi-year consistency.
| 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y ★ | 2Y | 3Y | All Time | Profitable Months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
-$13.25
-100.0% ROI |
-$10
-5.1% ROI |
+$23
5.0% ROI |
-$135.5
-13.1% ROI |
-$72
-3.3% ROI |
+$15.5
0.5% ROI |
-$87.75
-2.2% ROI |
5 / 12 |
📅 Year-by-year consistency breakdown
Annual profit & loss consistency across every calendar year in the archive.
| Year | Cost | Gross | Net Profit | Hits | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $920.75 | $1,162.5 | +$241.75 | 25 | 26.3% |
| 2024 | $1,154.25 | $1,050 | -$104.25 | 21 | -9.0% |
| 2025 | $1,167 | $1,050 | -$117 | 23 | -10.0% |
| 2026 | $745.75 | $637.5 | -$108.25 | 15 | -14.5% |
📈 Monthly profit & loss history
🏆 Most-hit families in this strategy
Families that generated the highest number of winning hits when played by this strategy.
🎯 Recent winning hits (last 6)
| Date | Draw | Number | Family | Pattern Type | Payout | Trigger Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-28 | Evening | 856 | 568 | distinct | +$37.50 | voted by 2: overdue-10, carryover-overdue-10 |
| 2026-08-21 | Evening | 802 | 028 | distinct | +$37.50 | voted by 2: overdue-10, carryover-overdue-10 |
| 2026-07-22 | Midday | 652 | 256 | distinct | +$37.50 | voted by 2: overdue-10, carryover-overdue-10 |
| 2026-07-08 | Midday | 822 | 228 | double 2x Double | +$75.00 | voted by 2: overdue-10, carryover-overdue-10 |
| 2026-06-17 | Evening | 175 | 157 | distinct | +$37.50 | voted by 2: overdue-10, carryover-overdue-10 |
| 2026-06-17 | Midday | 645 | 456 | distinct | +$37.50 | voted by 2: overdue-10, carryover-overdue-10 |