Dashboard · Performance · Strategy Scouting Report
RB9 Math · Law of Large Numbers Deficit Chase (Top 1)
Dynamic Walk-Forward 678 total plays 0.9 families/draw
Mean-reversion chase: exploits root deficits predicted by the Law of Large Numbers (+3.93% All-Time ROI across 13,855 draws).
🧠 How this strategy works
Methodology & Selection Logic
Mean-reversion chase: exploits root deficits predicted by the Law of Large Numbers (+3.93% All-Time ROI across 13,855 draws).
Execution & Cost Profile
- Play Sizing: Averages 0.9 boxed families per drawing.
- Cost per Active Draw: ~$0.23 (0.9 × $0.25).
- Settlement: Every play is settled against actual historical drawings without lookahead bias.
- Trigger Behavior: Re-evaluated before every drawing based strictly on past occurrences.
🎯 Next draw plays — Midday · 09/06/2026
Active numbers in this chase cycle:
| Family | Type | Current Status | Selection Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | double | Draw 10 of 10 | 7 pairs frequently with 5, 2, 0, 1 (from 074 Evening 2026-08-31) · 7 pairs frequently with 5, 2, 0, 1 (from 537 Midday 2026-08-31) · Chase Step 10 of 10 (Stop-on-Hit for trigger 042) |
📊 Key performance metrics (1 year walk-forward)
Evaluated across 732 drawings (2025-09-05 → 2026-09-04). Multi-year consistency benchmark: $-214 (-34.2% ROI across 2,506 all-time draws).
💼 Bankroll & Staking Simulator
Test how this strategy would have performed with different stake sizes and starting bankrolls, based on the actual historical walk-forward results.
⏱ Trailing window performance & consistency
How this strategy performed across each standard lookback window, plus profitable months out of the trailing 12. Compare short-term sweet spots against multi-year consistency.
| 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y ★ | 2Y | 3Y | All Time | Profitable Months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
-$2
-100.0% ROI |
+$117
354.5% ROI |
+$71.5
91.1% ROI |
+$55.5
32.7% ROI |
-$14.5
-4.1% ROI |
-$122.5
-22.9% ROI |
-$214
-34.2% ROI |
3 / 12 |
📅 Year-by-year consistency breakdown
Annual profit & loss consistency across every calendar year in the archive.
| Year | Cost | Gross | Net Profit | Hits | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $137.5 | $0 | -$137.5 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 2024 | $183 | $75 | -$108 | 2 | -59.0% |
| 2025 | $182.5 | $187.5 | +$5 | 3 | 2.7% |
| 2026 | $123.5 | $150 | +$26.5 | 2 | 21.5% |
📈 Monthly profit & loss history
🎯 Historical chase hit distribution (Which draw do hits land on?)
3 Documented Hits in BacktestDistribution of winning hits across the 10-draw chase window. Shorter chases lock in higher net profit by minimizing wager accumulation.
💡 How to Read This Chart: In stop-on-hit chasing, every draw a number takes to hit costs an additional $0.25 per family. Hits landing on Draws 1 through 3 yield maximum profit margin ($35.00+ net on a $37.50 distinct payout). If a candidate reaches Draw 10 without hitting, the cycle expires to prevent runaway drawdown.
🏆 Most-hit families in this strategy
Families that generated the highest number of winning hits when played by this strategy.
🎯 Recent winning hits (last 3)
| Date | Draw | Number | Family | Pattern Type | Payout | Trigger Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-08 | Evening | 885 | 588 | double 2x Double | +$75.00 | 54, 55, 60 directly follow each other (from 575 Midday 2026-08-03) · 60, 55, 45 directly follow each other (from 575 Midday 2026-08-03) [RB9 Root 3 Aligned] · Chase Step 10 of 10 (Stop-on-Hit for trigger 114) |
| 2026-07-09 | Evening | 771 | 177 | double 2x Double | +$75.00 | 1 usually brings 7 or 4; 7&1 / 4&1 together (from 139 Midday 2026-07-07) · 1 usually brings 7 or 4; 7&1 / 4&1 together (from 139 Midday 2026-07-07) — contains digit 7 [RB9 Root 6 Aligned] · Chase Step 5 of 10 (Stop-on-Hit for trigger 139) |
| 2025-10-05 | Midday | 344 | 344 | double 2x Double | +$75.00 | pairs after 00: fall next draw or draw after (from 300 Evening 2025-10-03) · 1 usually brings 7 or 4; 7&1 / 4&1 together (from 881 Evening 2025-10-04) — contains digit 4 [RB9 Root 2 Aligned] · Chase Step 1 of 10 (Stop-on-Hit for trigger 881) |