Dashboard · Performance · Strategy Scouting Report
RB9 Math · Law of Large Numbers Deficit Hold (Top 1)
Dynamic Walk-Forward 1,074 total plays 1.0 families/draw
Mean-reversion hold: exploits root deficits predicted by the Law of Large Numbers (+3.93% All-Time ROI across 13,855 draws).
🧠 How this strategy works
Methodology & Selection Logic
Mean-reversion hold: exploits root deficits predicted by the Law of Large Numbers (+3.93% All-Time ROI across 13,855 draws).
Execution & Cost Profile
- Play Sizing: Averages 1.0 boxed families per drawing.
- Cost per Active Draw: ~$0.24 (1.0 × $0.25).
- Settlement: Every play is settled against actual historical drawings without lookahead bias.
- Trigger Behavior: Re-evaluated before every drawing based strictly on past occurrences.
🎯 Next draw plays — Day · 09/12/2026
Active numbers in this hold cycle:
| Family | Type | Current Status | Selection Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0037 | double | Hold Draw 10 of 10 | 7 pairs frequently with 5, 2, 0, 1 (from 3197 Evening 2026-08-29) · 58: look for 78 and/or 30 pair (from 0958 Evening 2026-08-28) [RB9 Root 1 Aligned] · Hold Draw 10 of 10 (Stop-on-Drop for trigger 0332) |
Quantitative Diagnostic: High Efficiency: Strong ROI lift with significant ticket cost reduction.
| Dimension / Metric | Standard Baseline | ⚡ High-Efficiency Optimized | Variance & Capital Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Plays Placed | 500 | 426 | -14.8% wagers eliminated |
| Winning Hits Captured | 1 | 1 | 100.0% hits retained |
| Hit Rate Efficiency | 0.20% | 0.23% | +0.03% |
| Capital Invested | $125.00 | $142.00 | +$18.50 saved |
| Net Profit / Loss | +$62.50 | +$233.00 | +$170.50 turnaround |
| Return on Investment (ROI) | 50.0% | 164.1% | +114.1% ROI Lift |
📊 Key performance metrics (3 years walk-forward)
Evaluated across 1,097 drawings (2023-09-08 → 2026-09-08). Multi-year consistency benchmark: $-292 (-100.0% ROI across 1,167 all-time draws).
💼 Bankroll & Staking Simulator
Test how this strategy would have performed with different stake sizes and starting bankrolls, based on the actual historical walk-forward results.
⏱ Trailing window performance & consistency
How this strategy performed across each standard lookback window, plus profitable months out of the trailing 12. Compare short-term sweet spots against multi-year consistency.
| 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y ★ | 2Y | 3Y | All Time | Profitable Months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
-$2
-100.0% ROI |
-$17.5
-100.0% ROI |
-$40.25
-100.0% ROI |
-$85.75
-100.0% ROI |
-$177
-100.0% ROI |
-$268.5
-100.0% ROI |
-$291.75
-100.0% ROI |
0 / 12 |
📅 Year-by-year consistency breakdown
Annual profit & loss consistency across every calendar year in the archive.
| Year | Cost | Gross | Net Profit | Hits | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $46.25 | $0 | -$46.25 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 2024 | $91.5 | $0 | -$91.5 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 2025 | $91.25 | $0 | -$91.25 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 2026 | $62.75 | $0 | -$62.75 | 0 | -100.0% |