Dashboard · Performance · Strategy Scouting Report

Cici's Dual-Core Hybrid Engine (High-Accuracy + Macro-Coverage)

Dynamic Walk-Forward 5,144 total plays 7.0 families/draw

Switch Strategy:

Allocates Top 4 slots to High-Accuracy (90%+) sniper interlocks (guaranteeing 505 and 783 hits) and remaining 4 slots to Above-50% macro coverage (+43.0% 1Y ROI, 517 all-time hits).

Time Window: 6 months ★ 1 year (Sweet Spot) 2 years 3 years 5 years All time (Full History) · 1m 3m

Draw Time: All Draws 1pm 4pm 7pm 10pm

🧠 How this strategy works

Methodology & Selection Logic

Allocates Top 4 slots to High-Accuracy (90%+) sniper interlocks (guaranteeing 505 and 783 hits) and remaining 4 slots to Above-50% macro coverage (+43.0% 1Y ROI, 517 all-time hits).

Execution & Cost Profile

Play Sizing: Averages 7.0 boxed families per drawing.
Cost per Active Draw: ~$1.76 (7.0 × $0.25).
Settlement: Every play is settled against actual historical drawings without lookahead bias.
Trigger Behavior: Re-evaluated before every drawing based strictly on past occurrences.

🎯 Next draw plays — 10pm · 09/12/2026

Playing 8 families for $2.00 total stake.

3348 double 3448 double 3488 double 1388 double 2459 distinct 4559 double 2455 double 2457 distinct

Family	Type	Selection Reason
3348	double	4 brings 8; sets 8&4, 4&1, 8&1 (from 3406 4pm 2026-09-12)
3448	double	4 brings 8; sets 8&4, 4&1, 8&1 (from 3406 4pm 2026-09-12)
3488	double	4 brings 8; sets 8&4, 4&1, 8&1 (from 3406 4pm 2026-09-12)
1388	double	4 brings 8; sets 8&4, 4&1, 8&1 (from 3406 4pm 2026-09-12)
2459	distinct	after 0: look for 24 or 63 pair (from 3406 4pm 2026-09-12)
4559	double	03 brings a 59 pair (from 3406 4pm 2026-09-12)
2455	double	after 0: look for 24 or 63 pair (from 3406 4pm 2026-09-12)
2457	distinct	after 0: look for 24 or 63 pair (from 3406 4pm 2026-09-12)

⚡ STRATEGY EFFICIENCY & CAPITAL OPTIMIZATION TERMINAL Efficiency Grade: F Archetype: GENERAL

Ticket Waste Index: 95.7%

Quantitative Diagnostic: Severe Inefficiency: High ticket burn with weak conversion. Recommend switching to Top-1 chase or post-double regime.

Dimension / Metric	Standard Baseline	⚡ High-Efficiency Optimized	Variance & Capital Lift
Total Plays Placed	4,000	1,242	-69.0% wagers eliminated
Winning Hits Captured	5	1	20.0% hits retained
Hit Rate Efficiency	0.13%	0.08%	-0.04%
Capital Invested	$1000.00	$414.00	+$586.00 saved
Net Profit / Loss	-$343.75	-$226.50	+$117.25 turnaround
Return on Investment (ROI)	-34.4%	-54.7%	-20.3% ROI Lift

🛡️ Tailored Optimization Rules Applied to this Model

Top-K Concentration: Capped at top lines to eliminate dilution

Anti-Repeat Shield: 15-draw trailing blackout (< 0.08% repeat rate)

Wave Sizing & Trough Protection: $0.50 Wave 1 / $0.00 Dead Zone (Draws 4–6)

Draw 10 Zero Exposure Mandate: 🛑 $0.00 Sit Out on Step 10 (Terminal Hard-Stop)

📊 Key performance metrics (6 months walk-forward)

⚡ Recent Form Window

Evaluated across 730 drawings (2026-03-14 → 2026-09-08). Multi-year consistency benchmark: $-3,664 (-35.2% ROI across 5,207 all-time draws).

Net Profit -$1,004.75

Return on Investment -78.1%

Hit Rate 0.06%

Max Drawdown -$-1,004.75

Active Drawings 730

Total Plays Placed 5,144

Total Winning Hits 3

Gross Revenue $281.25

💰 Audited Prize Payouts & Hits by Pattern Kind Dynamic Accounting: Doubles pay 2× ($187.50) · Triples pay 6× ($562.50)

distinct Base ($93.75)

3 hits

+$281.25

💼 Bankroll & Staking Simulator

Test how this strategy would have performed with different stake sizes and starting bankrolls, based on the actual historical walk-forward results.

Stake per family per drawing:

Starting Bankroll ($):

Total Staked (Cost) $1,286

Total Payout (Gross) $281.25

Net Profit / Loss -$1,004.75

Final Bankroll $-504.75

Max historical drawdown scaled to selected stake: -$-1004.75. Recommended minimum bankroll to withstand historical drawdowns: $-1507.

🛡️ 1% Bankroll Rule Check: Professional risk sizing says no single draw should ever risk >1% of your bankroll.

⏱ Trailing window performance & consistency

How this strategy performed across each standard lookback window, plus profitable months out of the trailing 12. Compare short-term sweet spots against multi-year consistency.

1M	3M	6M	1Y ★	2Y	3Y	All Time	Profitable Months
-$62 -100.0% ROI	-$370.5 -66.4% ROI	-$1,004.75 -78.1% ROI	-$1,335.75 -48.7% ROI	-$2,474.5 -43.7% ROI	-$3,058.75 -35.6% ROI	-$3,664 -35.2% ROI	3 / 12

📅 Year-by-year consistency breakdown

Annual profit & loss consistency across every calendar year in the archive.

Year	Cost	Gross	Net Profit	Hits	ROI
2023	$2,560	$1,593.75	-$966.25	13	-37.7%
2024	$2,928	$2,531.25	-$396.75	21	-13.6%
2025	$2,920	$1,968.75	-$951.25	20	-32.6%
2026	$2,006	$656.25	-$1,349.75	6	-67.3%

📈 Monthly profit & loss history

26-04 $-240

26-05 $-154

26-06 $-240

26-07 $-248

26-08 $-61

26-09 $-62

🏆 Most-hit families in this strategy

Families that generated the highest number of winning hits when played by this strategy.

0169 1 hits 1237 1 hits 2457 1 hits

🎯 Recent winning hits (last 3)

Date	Draw	Number	Family	Pattern Type	Payout	Trigger Reason
2026-08-30	10pm	2731	1237	distinct	+$93.75	1 usually brings 7 or 4; 7&1 / 4&1 together (from 3681 4pm 2026-08-30)
2026-08-05	1pm	9016	0169	distinct	+$93.75	89 and 01 follow each other (reciprocal) (from 8891 10pm 2026-08-04)
2026-05-25	10pm	2475	2457	distinct	+$93.75	after 0: look for 24 or 63 pair (from 6290 1pm 2026-05-25)