Dashboard · Performance · Strategy Scouting Report
Double Velocity (Trailing 120d · 30-Draw Cooldown)
Dynamic Walk-Forward 40 total plays 0.4 families/draw
High-efficiency 5-digit engine: tracks trailing 120-draw momentum across the 840-family double subspace (60 straight ways/family, 50.8% of all draws), enforcing a disciplined 30-draw post-hit sit-out (+49.9% GA ROI, 5/7 profitable states).
🧠 How this strategy works
Methodology & Selection Logic
High-efficiency 5-digit engine: tracks trailing 120-draw momentum across the 840-family double subspace (60 straight ways/family, 50.8% of all draws), enforcing a disciplined 30-draw post-hit sit-out (+49.9% GA ROI, 5/7 profitable states).
Execution & Cost Profile
- Play Sizing: Averages 0.4 boxed families per drawing.
- Cost per Active Draw: ~$0.10 (0.4 × $0.25).
- Settlement: Every play is settled against actual historical drawings without lookahead bias.
- Trigger Behavior: Re-evaluated before every drawing based strictly on past occurrences.
🎯 Next draw plays — Midday · 09/12/2026
Playing 1 families for $0.25 total stake.
| Family | Type | Selection Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 13345 | double | Double Velocity Leader (2 hits in trailing 120 draws) |
Quantitative Diagnostic: Severe Inefficiency: High ticket burn with weak conversion. Recommend switching to Top-1 chase or post-double regime.
| Dimension / Metric | Standard Baseline | ⚡ High-Efficiency Optimized | Variance & Capital Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Plays Placed | 238 | 214 | -10.1% wagers eliminated |
| Winning Hits Captured | 0 | 0 | 100% hits retained |
| Hit Rate Efficiency | 0.00% | 0.00% | +0.00% |
| Capital Invested | $59.50 | $71.50 | +$6.00 saved |
| Net Profit / Loss | -$59.50 | -$71.50 | -$12.00 turnaround |
| Return on Investment (ROI) | -100.0% | -100.0% | +0.0% ROI Lift |
📊 Key performance metrics (3 months walk-forward)
Evaluated across 96 drawings (2026-06-12 → 2026-09-08). Multi-year consistency benchmark: +$226 (152.1% ROI across 595 all-time draws).
💼 Bankroll & Staking Simulator
Test how this strategy would have performed with different stake sizes and starting bankrolls, based on the actual historical walk-forward results.
⏱ Trailing window performance & consistency
How this strategy performed across each standard lookback window, plus profitable months out of the trailing 12. Compare short-term sweet spots against multi-year consistency.
| 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y ★ | 2Y | 3Y | All Time | Profitable Months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
-$2
-100.0% ROI |
-$10
-100.0% ROI |
-$31.25
-100.0% ROI |
-$54
-100.0% ROI |
-$87
-100.0% ROI |
-$141
-100.0% ROI |
+$226.25
152.1% ROI |
0 / 11 |
📅 Year-by-year consistency breakdown
Annual profit & loss consistency across every calendar year in the archive.
| Year | Cost | Gross | Net Profit | Hits | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $19.75 | $375 | +$355.25 | 1 | 1798.7% |
| 2024 | $50.25 | $0 | -$50.25 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 2025 | $39.25 | $0 | -$39.25 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 2026 | $39.5 | $0 | -$39.5 | 0 | -100.0% |