Dashboard · Performance · Strategy Scouting Report
Cash 4 High-Conviction Consensus (≥ 2 Agreement)
Dynamic Walk-Forward 5 total plays 0.1 families/draw
Selective consensus sniper: wagers ONLY on families recommended by at least 2 independent 4-digit quantitative engines, weighted by empirical engine hit accuracy.
🧠 How this strategy works
Methodology & Selection Logic
Selective consensus sniper: wagers ONLY on families recommended by at least 2 independent 4-digit quantitative engines, weighted by empirical engine hit accuracy.
Execution & Cost Profile
- Play Sizing: Averages 0.1 boxed families per drawing.
- Cost per Active Draw: ~$0.02 (0.1 × $0.25).
- Settlement: Every play is settled against actual historical drawings without lookahead bias.
- Trigger Behavior: Re-evaluated before every drawing based strictly on past occurrences.
🎯 Next draw plays — Midday · 09/10/2026
Playing 1 families for $0.25 total stake.
| Family | Type | Selection Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 0347 | distinct | Consensus verified (Score 4.1 from 2 independent engines: cici-dual-core-hybrid, empirical-followed-by) · 56 brings digit 3 and/or pair 37 (from 5968 Midday 2026-09-08) |
Quantitative Diagnostic: Moderate Efficiency: Breakeven equilibrium; capital preserved with reduced downside exposure.
| Dimension / Metric | Standard Baseline | ⚡ High-Efficiency Optimized | Variance & Capital Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Plays Placed | 0 | 0 | -0% wagers eliminated |
| Winning Hits Captured | 0 | 0 | 100% hits retained |
| Hit Rate Efficiency | 0.00% | 0.00% | +0.00% |
| Capital Invested | $0.00 | $0.00 | +$0.00 saved |
| Net Profit / Loss | +$0.00 | +$0.00 | +$0.00 turnaround |
| Return on Investment (ROI) | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% ROI Lift |
📊 Key performance metrics (1 month walk-forward)
Evaluated across 61 drawings (2026-08-10 → 2026-09-09). Multi-year consistency benchmark: $-88 (-100.0% ROI across 325 all-time draws).
💼 Bankroll & Staking Simulator
Test how this strategy would have performed with different stake sizes and starting bankrolls, based on the actual historical walk-forward results.
⏱ Trailing window performance & consistency
How this strategy performed across each standard lookback window, plus profitable months out of the trailing 12. Compare short-term sweet spots against multi-year consistency.
| 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y ★ | 2Y | 3Y | All Time | Profitable Months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
-$1.25
-100.0% ROI |
-$10
-100.0% ROI |
-$13.75
-100.0% ROI |
-$27.5
-100.0% ROI |
-$60.75
-100.0% ROI |
-$78
-100.0% ROI |
-$87.75
-100.0% ROI |
0 / 12 |
📅 Year-by-year consistency breakdown
Annual profit & loss consistency across every calendar year in the archive.
| Year | Cost | Gross | Net Profit | Hits | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $13.75 | $0 | -$13.75 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 2024 | $23 | $0 | -$23 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 2025 | $30.75 | $0 | -$30.75 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 2026 | $20.25 | $0 | -$20.25 | 0 | -100.0% |