Dashboard · Performance · Strategy Scouting Report
RB9 Math · Law of Large Numbers Deficit Hold (Top 1)
Dynamic Walk-Forward 294 total plays 0.9 families/draw
Mean-reversion hold: exploits root deficits predicted by the Law of Large Numbers (+3.93% All-Time ROI across 13,855 draws).
🧠 How this strategy works
Methodology & Selection Logic
Mean-reversion hold: exploits root deficits predicted by the Law of Large Numbers (+3.93% All-Time ROI across 13,855 draws).
Execution & Cost Profile
- Play Sizing: Averages 0.9 boxed families per drawing.
- Cost per Active Draw: ~$0.23 (0.9 × $0.25).
- Settlement: Every play is settled against actual historical drawings without lookahead bias.
- Trigger Behavior: Re-evaluated before every drawing based strictly on past occurrences.
🎯 Next draw plays — Evening · 09/13/2026
Active numbers in this hold cycle:
| Family | Type | Current Status | Selection Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0366 | double | Hold Draw 10 of 10 | after 0: look for 24 or 63 pair (from 0642 Evening 2026-09-01) · 54, 55, 60 directly follow each other (from 0642 Evening 2026-09-01) [RB9 Root 6 Aligned] · Hold Draw 10 of 10 (Stop-on-Drop for trigger 0931) |
Quantitative Diagnostic: Severe Inefficiency: High ticket burn with weak conversion. Recommend switching to Top-1 chase or post-double regime.
| Dimension / Metric | Standard Baseline | ⚡ High-Efficiency Optimized | Variance & Capital Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Plays Placed | 500 | 450 | -10.0% wagers eliminated |
| Winning Hits Captured | 0 | 0 | 100% hits retained |
| Hit Rate Efficiency | 0.00% | 0.00% | +0.00% |
| Capital Invested | $125.00 | $150.00 | +$12.50 saved |
| Net Profit / Loss | -$125.00 | -$150.00 | -$25.00 turnaround |
| Return on Investment (ROI) | -100.0% | -100.0% | +0.0% ROI Lift |
📊 Key performance metrics (1 year walk-forward)
Evaluated across 314 drawings (2025-09-12 → 2026-09-08). Multi-year consistency benchmark: $-56 (-23.0% ROI across 974 all-time draws).
💼 Bankroll & Staking Simulator
Test how this strategy would have performed with different stake sizes and starting bankrolls, based on the actual historical walk-forward results.
⏱ Trailing window performance & consistency
How this strategy performed across each standard lookback window, plus profitable months out of the trailing 12. Compare short-term sweet spots against multi-year consistency.
| 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y ★ | 2Y | 3Y | All Time | Profitable Months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
-$1.75
-100.0% ROI |
-$15
-100.0% ROI |
-$34.5
-100.0% ROI |
-$73.5
-100.0% ROI |
+$35.75
23.6% ROI |
-$42.5
-18.5% ROI |
-$56
-23.0% ROI |
0 / 12 |
📅 Year-by-year consistency breakdown
Annual profit & loss consistency across every calendar year in the archive.
| Year | Cost | Gross | Net Profit | Hits | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $33 | $0 | -$33 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 2024 | $78.5 | $0 | -$78.5 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 2025 | $78.25 | $187.5 | +$109.25 | 1 | 139.6% |
| 2026 | $53.75 | $0 | -$53.75 | 0 | -100.0% |