Dashboard · Performance · Strategy Scouting Report
RB9 Math · Date-Harmony Chase (Top 1)
Dynamic Walk-Forward 1,019 total plays 0.9 families/draw
Root Base 9 invariant chase: wagers on the top candidate harmonized with the Date Root + Mirror/Flip (+84.93% 1Y ROI, +1.77% All-Time ROI).
Proof of Mathematical Edge: In number theory, every integer collapses modulo 9 into an invariant residue root. By synchronizing candidate selections with the Date Root plus Mirror and Flip triads, this engine captured 39 hits in the trailing year to deliver the highest flat net profit across all tested models.
🧠 How this strategy works
Methodology & Selection Logic
Root Base 9 invariant chase: wagers on the top candidate harmonized with the Date Root + Mirror/Flip (+84.93% 1Y ROI, +1.77% All-Time ROI).
Execution & Cost Profile
- Play Sizing: Averages 0.9 boxed families per drawing.
- Cost per Active Draw: ~$0.23 (0.9 × $0.25).
- Settlement: Every play is settled against actual historical drawings without lookahead bias.
- Trigger Behavior: Re-evaluated before every drawing based strictly on past occurrences.
🎯 Next draw plays — Midday · 09/06/2026
Active numbers in this chase cycle:
| Family | Type | Current Status | Selection Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | double | Draw 10 of 10 | 7 pairs frequently with 5, 2, 0, 1 (from 087 Evening 2026-09-02) · 7 pairs frequently with 5, 2, 0, 1 (from 437 Night 2026-09-01) [RB9 Root 7 Aligned] · Chase Step 10 of 10 (Stop-on-Hit for trigger 318) |
📊 Key performance metrics (1 year walk-forward)
Evaluated across 1,098 drawings (2025-09-05 → 2026-09-05). Multi-year consistency benchmark: +$61 (1.8% ROI across 13,856 all-time draws).
💼 Bankroll & Staking Simulator
Test how this strategy would have performed with different stake sizes and starting bankrolls, based on the actual historical walk-forward results.
⏱ Trailing window performance & consistency
How this strategy performed across each standard lookback window, plus profitable months out of the trailing 12. Compare short-term sweet spots against multi-year consistency.
| 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y ★ | 2Y | 3Y | All Time | Profitable Months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
-$3.5
-100.0% ROI |
-$12.5
-25.0% ROI |
+$31.75
26.8% ROI |
-$104.75
-41.1% ROI |
-$41
-7.8% ROI |
-$128
-15.9% ROI |
+$61
1.8% ROI |
2 / 12 |
📅 Year-by-year consistency breakdown
Annual profit & loss consistency across every calendar year in the archive.
| Year | Cost | Gross | Net Profit | Hits | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | $86 | $112.5 | +$26.5 | 2 | 30.8% |
| 2011 | $180.75 | $150 | -$30.75 | 2 | -17.0% |
| 2012 | $181.75 | $187.5 | +$5.75 | 3 | 3.2% |
| 2013 | $182.25 | $150 | -$32.25 | 2 | -17.7% |
| 2014 | $182.5 | $187.5 | +$5 | 3 | 2.7% |
| 2015 | $182 | $375 | +$193 | 6 | 106.0% |
| 2016 | $183 | $187.5 | +$4.5 | 4 | 2.5% |
| 2017 | $182.5 | $262.5 | +$80 | 5 | 43.8% |
| 2018 | $182.5 | $150 | -$32.5 | 3 | -17.8% |
| 2019 | $182.5 | $150 | -$32.5 | 2 | -17.8% |
| 2020 | $183 | $37.5 | -$145.5 | 1 | -79.5% |
| 2021 | $273.75 | $450 | +$176.25 | 10 | 64.4% |
| 2022 | $273.75 | $412.5 | +$138.75 | 7 | 50.7% |
| 2023 | $273.75 | $37.5 | -$236.25 | 1 | -86.3% |
| 2024 | $274.5 | $262.5 | -$12 | 4 | -4.4% |
| 2025 | $273.75 | $262.5 | -$11.25 | 6 | -4.1% |
| 2026 | $185.75 | $150 | -$35.75 | 3 | -19.2% |
📈 Monthly profit & loss history
🎯 Historical chase hit distribution (Which draw do hits land on?)
5 Documented Hits in BacktestDistribution of winning hits across the 10-draw chase window. Shorter chases lock in higher net profit by minimizing wager accumulation.
💡 How to Read This Chart: In stop-on-hit chasing, every draw a number takes to hit costs an additional $0.25 per family. Hits landing on Draws 1 through 3 yield maximum profit margin ($35.00+ net on a $37.50 distinct payout). If a candidate reaches Draw 10 without hitting, the cycle expires to prevent runaway drawdown.
🏆 Most-hit families in this strategy
Families that generated the highest number of winning hits when played by this strategy.
🎯 Recent winning hits (last 5)
| Date | Draw | Number | Family | Pattern Type | Payout | Trigger Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-10 | Evening | 372 | 237 | distinct | +$37.50 | 2 drawn in sets: 2&6, 5&2, 7&2 (from 271 Evening 2026-08-09) · 7 pairs frequently with 5, 2, 0, 1 (from 271 Evening 2026-08-09) [RB9 Root 3 Aligned] · Chase Step 1 of 10 (Stop-on-Hit for trigger 818) |
| 2026-04-12 | Midday | 702 | 027 | distinct | +$37.50 | 7 pairs frequently with 5, 2, 0, 1 (from 567 Night 2026-04-09) · 2 drawn in sets: 2&6, 5&2, 7&2 (from 726 Evening 2026-04-09) [RB9 Root 9 Aligned] · Chase Step 7 of 10 (Stop-on-Hit for trigger 567) |
| 2026-04-06 | Evening | 363 | 336 | double 2x Double | +$75.00 | after 0: look for 24 or 63 pair (from 024 Midday 2026-04-03) · after 0: look for 24 or 63 pair (from 062 Night 2026-04-02) [RB9 Root 3 Aligned] · Chase Step 9 of 10 (Stop-on-Hit for trigger 821) |
| 2025-09-28 | Night | 362 | 236 | distinct | +$37.50 | after 0: look for 24 or 63 pair (from 402 Midday 2025-09-26) · 2 drawn in sets: 2&6, 5&2, 7&2 (from 402 Midday 2025-09-26) [RB9 Root 2 Aligned] · Chase Step 8 of 10 (Stop-on-Hit for trigger 402) |
| 2025-09-12 | Night | 387 | 378 | distinct | +$37.50 | pairs after 00: fall next draw or draw after (from 900 Evening 2025-09-09) · 09: look for 78 or 38 pair (from 900 Evening 2025-09-09) [RB9 Root 9 Aligned] · Chase Step 10 of 10 (Stop-on-Hit for trigger 900) |